Advertisment
drgreene.com Home
Dec 30

Milk, Mad Cows, & Choosing Organic

When a nursing woman has a contagious illness, it.s usually safer to keep nursing . perhaps because the breast milk does not contain the germ and also because the milk does contain immune properties to fight the infection. In some situations, however, such as a mother with active phase hepatitis C, HIV, and HTLV-1 infections, it may be wisest to suspend nursing to prevent giving your child the infection. What about cows with mad cow disease? Is their milk safe for our children? The U.S. FDA issued a Christmas Eve 2003 statement reassuring that scientific data suggest that milk from infected cows does not transmit mad cow disease to cows, humans, or other animals. Mad cow disease is the popular name for BSE (bovine spongioform encephalopathy), a fatal degenerative disease in cattle. The organism that causes this in cattle can cause a similar disease in humans called vCJD (variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease). Humans can catch it by eating meat products made from infected cattle. But milk from infected cows tests negative for the prion that causes the infection. And when milk from infected cows is fed to cows or other animals, no sign of infection is seen. And of course, all animals known to carry the organism are removed from the food supply.

Unfortunately, however, animals with BSE might not be detected in a timely manner. In some countries, such as Japan, 100 percent of cattle are tested before they enter the food supply. By contrast, in 2003 the U.S. tested less than 0.06 percent of slaughtered cattle . those deemed to be at the highest risk. Nevertheless, these suspect cattle were allowed to enter the food supply before the test results were available. The first animal that tested positive for BSE in the U.S. was slaughtered on December 9. Meat from that animal and 19 others slaughtered at the same time had already been shipped to 9 states and Guam before the tests were reported positive 2 weeks later. Testing procedures are likely to change in 2004. Meanwhile, thankfully, the number of infected cattle appears to be small.

And as the FDA reassures, .National and international public health organizations continue to consistently declare milk and milk products safe, whether or not the country producing them has had cases. of mad cow disease.

BSE is thought to enter cattle herds through feed containing contaminated animal byproducts. Organic livestock standards require that animals are fed appropriate 100 percent organic feed. They must be allowed to graze outdoors in organic fields. They may not be given hormones to promote growth. If the cattle are sick or injured, they must be treated, but cannot then be sold as organic. When you buy certified organic products you are not buying products from the sick animals in the herd. The entire process, from before the animal is born till the day it dies, is designed to be healthy. I recommend choosing organic meat, milk, yogurt, eggs, and other animal products if the option is available. Especially in countries where conventional handling standards have led to the presence of mad cow disease.

Alan Greene MD FAAP


Originally posted December 30, 2003

2 Responses to Milk, Mad Cows, & Choosing Organic

  1. amy
    | August 23rd, 2008 at 6:14 pm

    I know this article is about milk, but I was also wondering, can mad cow disease be transferred through gravy? I know that some gravies have meat juices in them, but I’m not sure where those meat juices come from, & if mad cow can be transmitted through gravy in this way.

  2. Debbie Murphy
    | September 5th, 2008 at 7:41 am

    Just a note on the organics as being important. The book “Genetic Roulette, the Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods” by Jeffrey M. Smith as you know gives us a good reason to find a way to buy safer food (Thanks for being a commentator in this book!!!!!!!!!) Maybe you could give this book a plug on your site.

    Much of the world is against GM food, but the U.S. companies that produce it have forced their agenda on us, and witheld labelling so we don’t know what we’re eating, and the conventional media seems to be “in their hand” it seems, for whatever reason. GM food, along with its piggy-backing herbicides and pesticides, may be the health destroyer of our lifetimes, even worse than inactivity and junk food. And because it’s not labelled, buying organic is the only way to guarantee (hopefully) that you’re not eating it.

    Tell people to look up “monsanto” on the web and learn its history!

    Dr. Arden Anderson (in talks I have heard him give) notes that centurians today grew up when these unhealthy foods did not exist, and before pesticides and herbicides were used on crops. Therefore, they did not get the effects of these foods, or GM foods, when they were developing in their mothers’ wombs or growing as infants. There are enough wierd spikes in allergies, childhood cancers and neurological conditions that all of this makes a great deal of sense. There is even a strange disease (?megellan or something?) that causes skin eruptions with plastic-like fibers that contain genetically modified material never before seen in nature. Sounds like GM food to me!

Leave a Reply

We invite and welcome your comments. Please contribute to a polite and sincere discussion. Constructive disagreement is always fine, but personal attacks and disruptive comments are never acceptable, neither to the poster of the article nor to other readers who offer their comments. Any comment that seems designed to offend, or to disrupt a conversation rather than contribute to it, or is simply a commercial message, will be summarily deleted. Thank you for helping us keep the discussion going!